With a good lawyer, Lavezzi played Sunday in the first minute. Put it this way: 99% Lavezzi has spat with Rosi. I think so drawers and two Roman Juan vibratamente who protested against the linesman, they did understand Mazzarri, De Laurentiis and Gargano in the post-game, after talking, presumably with the few. And then Rosie, who probably spit on him if he felt, if it ever arrived at the target.
Therefore what we have seen and heard, this is a little 'thinking of all. The problem is that, with the trial televised chats are zero, are useless words of the protagonists in the post-game (although it should be studied as Napoli ran the story, right after the race) and unnecessary assumptions about what that seems to be the gesture. The television has only one test that you can not see through the cameras, or, that television is proof! We have said that probably
Lavezzi responded to Rosi, implementing one of the classic "eye for eye, tooth for tooth." But as already mentioned, the first thing we do not want even to analyze the issue from the ethical point of view, this is a problem in our house, society, the coach and player, for fines or punishment must be the Naples must reserve the right to choose. Here we consider the question at the only real way for the court Tosel: TV images. This is based solely on the evidence tv.
Napoli has the right and a duty for this very reason, to believe the judge's ruling sports, shameful. Rosi's spit and it shows, while the Lavezzi can not be sure that there is, and we can say with absolute certainty that the images available to us (the ones that did have Tosel), the sputum Lavezzi is not shown! It 'good to clarify this, before exposing any other consideration. The judge sentenced him to spit Rosi you see clearly, and also punished for Lavezzi a spit but it is only alleged, and not seen at all. Let us assume that Lavezzi was lucky, that of the Romanist Rosie can be seen, while his other hand no, but that test is whether television images are no longer talking, but what is a personal interpretation of what could happen. I invite you to imagine a scene that perhaps makes the story clearer. Imagine that Rosi and Lavezzi instead of spitting it would exchange punches in the face. Rosi punches him in the face of Lavezzi, taken from all the cameras present there, while Lavezzi first to respond with the same currency, is expected to enter in the locker room for the range. The only witnesses are, say two players at random, Drawers and Juan. From the cameras you would see clearly the handful of Rosi, but Lavezzi is gathered perhaps just his cute little closer so the opponent inside the locker room. What would happen? Following in the wake of that ruling royal, Rosi was disqualified with his fist to test television launched a Lavezzi, while few, even without proof television, would receive the same suspension, only because he is presumed to have hit the ' opponent. We are not talking about what has been done, here we talk about what has been seen. A ruling by feel, perhaps well justified for me did. Shame! Basiamoci on what you see Your Honor.
Lavezzi could spit it, how could he have told him a few words, how could it threatened, how could they have done just pretend they frighten him to spit it out, as it might have made him a raspberry. In short, it could have done anything, but, my dear Gianpaolo Tosel, tell me that you have certainty on what are the true facts?
We are ready to show you the trajectory of the spit of Rosi on Lavezzi, if you do not see we put a circle around if you want, but you, you'd know to do the same with spit Lavezzi to Rosie? That is the question. But what is the answer?
said that the rumors are zero when it comes to television test, the Napoli ran into the worst possible way the post-game. It's not that you were doing or building something, but you could at least sit down to choose a strategy. " All those who would come before the cameras were to use the same line. A specific question, maybe you say that the camp had not seen anything unusual, that the boy had not yet had a dialogue, and judge at the time, the "clear" that television images were proposed.
Regarding the ethical discourse if Lavezzi admits to having committed this particular act in response to Rosi, I would not even be so hard on him. Do not forget that is just a reaction to the gesture, so disgraceful that of Rosi. It is not ignoble gesture of why they call Rosi Rosi, Lavezzi and almost justifiable because it is the few, but what makes this despicable act is the first for having done so, while the other had no way to defend themselves. Why tell me, pretend to ignore, what he could do to defend Lavezzi? Right on the speech of the reaction, it is unthinkable to believe that Lavezzi, admitting that spitting could be seen clearly spell, would get the same punishment that he received Rosi, would be even more bleak the decision of the sports justice, that justice does not.
But there is the appeal, and the sports justice can be done a step toward credibility, the judge's messed Tosel dramatically, creating a precedent of evidence that television is not based on television pictures. And the lawyer of Naples has everything to overturn the sentence, starting from the grounds of the court showing big cracks. In the application will be evaluated again on television, and an end to the spit test contrary to Lavezzi, as said many times, is not there.
Nobody has the right to choose who plays in Naples and who is not only Mazzarri can do it!
