are games like yesterday where it is easy to see which category you belong to: if between the optimists or pessimists, between those who see the glass half full or between those who see it as half empty. The reason this occurs is the result. The 0-0 is among the most uncertain results that may come out in the first leg, which is why excessive optimism or pessimism is considered excessive compared to those who have the real possibility for next round in the game return.
The speech, however, becomes different, if (s) trust is not justified by the result but from what we saw in the field. Napoli played the game that was to play. Put into practice the words of Mazzarri to perfection, revealing a maturity, if desired, also unexpected. For long distances has made the game, risking little in defense, but despite this, creating at least four clear scoring to go ahead. It was not a arrembante Naples, but it should not be. He balanced throughout the game when to attack, when to defend and when to handle the race, going mostly in third gear, sometimes in the second, other times in the fourth. You could ask to hold the fourth gear a little 'more, probably in the right way, but this is also the disadvantage of playing the first inside the house, you do not know how far you can keep your foot on the accelerator. Napoli played the first leg qualifying aware that the game was played there in 180 minutes, this does not mean it has decided not to offend, but it has stuck with balance. He created the preconditions for take the lead without being counter-attacks but the opponents, aware that it is of fundamental importance in this kind of challenges do not conceding a goal at home. Villarreal thought above all not to take them, we had to worry about defending the result, far more than they did against Napoli.
Returning to the result, as this is very uncertain. In return Villarreal will have the bonus of playing at home, while the bonus Naples on away goals, having two out of three results, however, is certainly not a disadvantage.
Chapter Gargano. I am not among those who think that a fan can never blow the whistle, you just need support. Who do I fully appreciated it is clear, but it is also possible that in some cases a fan can show their displeasure. Fans have a great power not only to drag the team with his enthusiasm, but also can take place, also have their say on specific topics. With banners, for example, the protest on the big screen is great. Or even with the whistles. You can whistle because you have the feeling that a player not to engage or do not give up, or because they may not like the attitude he has. You can whistle to send messages. A message where the coach wants to see that the 28th step wrong in a row might be the case to replace that player booed, or the player himself who after pulling 1200 punishments without positive results could also allow for a player (Mascara) who did a little 'better career. But at the end of this long introduction I think that whistle a player who is out of range, especially after he played a game more than enough and gave everything on the pitch, is really a bad show. Whistle after a wrong step but after the first or second of the game, is a haunting sadness. E 'counter for the player who will be brought to become nervous, and more and more mistakes. Returning from the perspective of messages delivered by the fans, help me find a clue: "we're missing so many months February to June, the team is fine, but despite this we put against you (although you are among the owners, the captain yesterday) and at least until the conclusion of the season, there we have to endure. " Not to mention that in addition to being counter-productive for the player can also be negative for the team, here you cross the border. I also take place: fine free kick before the whistle, that's fine even when they are wrong again so many steps, but not without reason! Just for the fun of himself against the player.
Whistle for those who booed when he left, cheers to those who applauded.
No comments:
Post a Comment