Starting from the technical component to arrive later in the arbitration.
The world (of football) is beautiful because it is different, each the may think differently, everyone can get a different idea on a particular matter. But when we expose some considerations you cross the limit, some reviews on the subject can not be accepted. In Italy the "experts" football "teach" you have to watch the game before the result; strange note though, that even after a few months the same people affected by the outcome, are practically busted analysis than what was the game actually played. This may be one reason or another could simply result from having too little memory, the hope is this, not that the games are considered having some sort of blinders to any team.
All this preamble to talk about Napoli-Milan, first leg. It is not the first time I hear that the Naples to Milan will have to prove something, to clear the performance is not positive, against Milan in the first round, and against Inter in Italian Cup. Pass the match against Inter Milan deservedly lost 3-1 in Naples, however, the two Milan have gone in a totally unfair. The Italian is a recent cup match, we all remember the good performance by Napoli and Inter Milan as he suffered in that very challenge. A balanced first half, and later on, the Inter the ball has seen very little, the same holds true for those who were extra-time, Without wishing to go into the merits of questionable refereeing decisions. We go now to speak of Napoli-Milan: I think the title is indicative. Who remembers those incessant applause at the end of the race, reserved for players? Yet for some reason to applaud in spite of a defeat will be. Obviously those fans of Napoli, much of these journalists, they know football. I'll remind me why the St. Paul that night cheered the players. Twenty minutes of the first half hardly played, Mazzarri spoke of excessive tension of his players, in those twenty minutes, the Milan had to score the 0-1. Then the game changed radically, at least from a performance point of view, the Naples began to play as you know, good ball possession and scoring four built in the first half to take a draw. Things were not the best for Milan but suddenly found a valuable ally in Rizzoli: Patience and a second warning for failure to Sokratis second warning, but this then we'll talk. In 10 Napoli continued to make his game, creating more scoring, considering the five goals of Lavezzi. Feel that Naples has not seen the ball with AC Milan's ridiculous! E 'unjust if it is not true, but it becomes ridiculous when it is almost the reverse: 10 v Napoli in the 11th game of the dominated, forcing Milan to play only recovered, only counter-attack. For those that game remembers it and the judge correctly, know that Napoli deserved at least a draw if not win, coll'uomo less is practically on the ropes to put AC Milan were playing against a team even lower category. That's why the St. Paul 60 thousand cheered, impossible not to consider beyond the result, the outstanding performance of the blue. How
said it took its Rizzoli, Milan, and that Monday I had a desperate need. What made the incredible performance of the referee, it was not looking at a deduction, rather than a penalty kick a doubt, his game was "extraordinary" in judging two fouls, one of patience and the other of Sokratis in as opposed to disciplinary, although the opposite should have been the choice of the arbitrator. Sorrentino's words about the diversity of regulation depending on the shirt you wear, are more relevant than ever. Patience struck his arm in the court opposing hands similar to that of De Rossi in Bologna and Rome, where Banti Braschi and did not deserve the second yellow. Exactly similar but not identical. That's compared to that of De Rossi Patience is indeed a lot smarter, while De Rossi stopped a restart of Bologna, Patience struck his arm in action in the fledgling field goal by Milan's attacking. In addition, the hand ball in Pazienza than that of De Rossi was much less voluntary and more instinctive. The fact is that the warning had to be there and instead there was. 51st minute, a second warning Sokratis holy holy, or so it should have been. Lavezzi was preparing to enter the penalty area when Sokratis unable to keep the speed of Pocho, spread it. For the second yellow except for Rizzoli. For how to change the destiny of a race, reversing an 11 to 10, in a 10 versus 11 to ask the referee Bologna. We hope that it will also star with that game, in deciding the final standings.
What is certain is that the referee reversed the numbers of Bologna that game, and now with his performance has also reversed the numbers in the final standings. These numbers reversed
with dates and no warnings, and the implications for that game and in the current standings:
Naples 10, Milan on 11.
Napoli 1, Naples, Milan 52 Milan 55 2
With arbitrage simply correct the numbers were these:
Naples 11, Milan on 10.
Napoli 2, Napoli Milan 1
55 Milan 52
power of an arbitrator.
The only thing I'm not convinced by these numbers is the result, difficult to think only of winning 2-1 (0-1 in the 51st minute at the time of the disaster), as the Naples played that game, the result would have been more round. The substance of the numbers, however, does not change. How to say the Naples did not deserve to win that game is absurd to say that Milan deserved the win because he has dominated is absolutely ridiculous.
No comments:
Post a Comment